I saw the movie yesterday, i actually waited the whole to get myself soaked in the story..actually to count the number of villians and their histories in the movie they are borsdering five, that's an achievement, i think it has equalled van helsing in the number of villians, for all those roger eberts out there it's gonna be tough

but i actually thought of giving a good review because this was the first time in my life that i payed 50rs for a popcorn(caramel flavoured!) and lost rs120 for the tickets at the brilliantly furnished blore multiplex inox(we have it now in chennai too!)

Too much of swinging and less of story make spidey a dull boy actually , i always knew that these sequels had engineered stories to bring in the first week collections, anyways i liked the first one and had mixed feelings about the second,the good thing is tobey maguire(peter parker/spidey) has gone through a complete transformation but undoubtedly only peter parker stands out, kirsten dunst has more to do than act in broadway, the spidey sense of humour is lacking compared to the first two movies, it is actually the homour which makes spiderman the most loved teeange hero,the movie does have dark tones to it, but at somepoint of time you feel that film could have ended before the interval,but what amzed me was that the climax resembled the many number of tamil movies which i have watched through the years...

like many other film crtiques(i have devoloped some confidence into calling me one anyways guys pls adjust na!)i too have devoloped the reel-o-meter which not just an ordinary grading tool, well i myself stil desinged it's specifications...maybe next time
so thats 4.5 outta 10 on the meter for spidey 3
stop we don't need more sequels
thank you

satyeki


Close